Re: Voyage of Time: Life's Journey, de Terrence Malick (2016)
Ayer a la noche fue el pase de prensa del film de Malick, y ya han salido las primeras reviews escritas... y como en los últimos años en el caso del realizador tejano, son muy divisivas:
-The Hollywood Reporter (bastante positiva): "A uniquely vivid work."
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/rev...e-lifes-926082
-The Guardian (Puntuación: ★★★★ (sobre 5): "The feature length version of Malick’s long-gestating chronicle of all things great and small is a visual feast – even if it doesn’t explain much along the way"
https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...-festival-2016
-Variety (simplemente ok): "Terrence Malick has made a reverent and spectacular IMAX nature documentary that's suffused with cosmic beauty, and with a little too much cosmic indulgence."
http://variety.com/2016/film/reviews...ck-1201852631/
-The Playlist (no muy entusiasmados B-/C+): "Terrence Malick Has Made His Movie Again With ‘Voyage of Time: Life’s Journey’"
http://theplaylist.net/terrence-mali...view-20160906/
Re: Voyage of Time: Life's Journey, de Terrence Malick (2016)
Se aproxima el estreno en IMAX del film, así que empiezan a salir nuevos clips apoyando el evento:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WQvYfmXHeA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vF-k5kozLc
Un saludo.
Re: Voyage of Time: Life's Journey, de Terrence Malick (2016)
Re: Voyage of Time: Life's Journey, de Terrence Malick (2016)
Trailer en 4k de la versión IMAX (narrada por Brad Pitt):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV0Nhu_CJBk
Un saludo.
Re: Voyage of Time: Life's Journey, de Terrence Malick (2016)
El film será re-estrenado en 21 salas en USA este viernes, 9 de diciembre, en una version "Ultra wide-screen" con un ratio de 3,6x1, distinta en duración a la version IMAX de octubre, y sin voz en off. Este corte de la peli se titulará Voyage of Time: The IMAX Experience in Ultra Widescreen 3,6:
http://variety.com/2016/film/in-cont...se-1201933834/
Cita:
The film was scanned at an ultra-dense 11K resolution, and the team would pluck certain shots out in the 3.6:1 ratio. Interestingly, it worked with the majority of shots in the film.
“That’s because when you’re framing for IMAX, the lower third of the frame is where the audience’s attention is, and that’s how you try to frame it,” Atkins says. “The top of the frame, you don’t often put important information up there. So you can actually extract a more narrow aspect ratio out of that frame and it still works.”
El poster:
http://i.imgur.com/na1RLr1.jpg
Un saludo.
