
Terminator 2: el juicio final (Terminator 2: Judgment Day, 1991, James Cameron)
No podemos conectar con Amazon
Terminator 2: Edición especial
Terminator 2: Judgement Day | James Cameron | Universal | 1991
Lanzamiento Blu-ray
21-05-2009
Pistas de audio
- DTS HD Master Audio 5.1 Español
- DTS HD Master Audio 5.1 Inglés
- Dolby Digital EX 5.1 Inglés
- Dolby Digital 2.1 Inglés
Ediciones con audio en castellano
Confirmar otras ediciones
Subtítulos
Español, Inglés
Comprar Blu-ray Ficha completa
País
Audio
Subt.
Precio
Envío
Total(*)
(*) Siendo Amazon Premium descuentas los gastos de envío
-
re: Terminator 2: el juicio final (Terminator 2: Judgment Day, 1991, James Cameron)

Iniciado por
tatoadsl
Pero es posible que le importe poco y luego decida cargarselo con montones de DNR y además ser consciente de ello.
Hoy puede ser, pero en 1991 lo de quitar después el grano no lo aplicaba tanto. Salvo que su idea fuera ir tirando y mientras rodaba Terminator 2 dijera: "hoy se va a ver fatal con grano, acentuado además por el Super 35 que estoy usando, pero en 2017 se va a ver de vicio, le pienso añadir hasta una nueva dimensión".
Edit: Mira, pues no, antes hasta le gustaba mucho allá por 2003.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/200...tbfisouthbank1
Q10: How long do you think 35mm film will last as a format?
JC: I think it'll be around for a while because people will choose it, but I think it's being made obsolete, on a purely practical basis, pretty darn rapidly. It still can do a couple of things you can't do with HDTV - there are some frame-rate issues. A lot of people seem to think that the colour space is inferior in HDTV to film, but they're wrong. It's actually superior and it's getting better. The thing that everybody has to realise is that with HDTV you have greatly superior resolution, equivalent colour space, and less contrast ratio overall. I shouldn't say that: you have the same contrast ratio in the final projected image but you don't have the dynamic range to be able to make the mistake of overexposing or underexposing two stops and fix it later. But in HDTV you shouldn't be making that mistake because you can see the image on a HD monitor and that image is what your final film will look like, so there's no mystery, no going to dailies the next day to see how it comes out. It becomes a more controlled and disciplined process.
But 35mm is still necessary for certain high speed, very slow motion types of shots, and in fact to do a movie fully in HD right now you're still going to be carrying a 35mm camera for certain types of shots. So it's not a panacea yet - we're in a transition phase, which we will be, call it if you're pessimistic, for the next five years. I'm going to make my next film digitally, so as far as I'm concerned I'm already through it, I'm just working through some of the bugs. But call it five years from now, it'll all be just a matter of choice. I like to hear the film run through the camera, I like to hear it flap out, I like to use the time they need to reload the magazines to go get a cappucino - for whatever reason, I like the grain, the crappy, messed-up look of film.
Última edición por Komond; 26/11/2017 a las 14:05
Etiquetas para este tema
Permisos de publicación
- No puedes crear nuevos temas
- No puedes responder temas
- No puedes subir archivos adjuntos
- No puedes editar tus mensajes
-
Reglas del foro